54 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
A primary theme of The Prince and the Dressmaker is gender-expansive self-expression through the medium of fashion. “Gender expansive” refers not only to identities outside the gender binary but presentations that subvert or ignore prevailing gender norms—represented in the novel primarily by Sebastian, as well as several secondary characters whose clothing doesn’t conform to traditionally gendered stereotypes. Meeting Frances and becoming inspired by her designs for Crystallia provides a catalyst for Sebastian that propels his arc toward an expansive understanding of his own identity.
Creating the persona of Crystallia with the help of Frances’s designs allows Sebastian to access and express elements of his personality that he’s not yet ready reveal to his family and community. Crown Prince Sebastian is depicted in the first half of the novel as self-conscious and overly concerned with living up to others’ expectations. According to Juliana, Sebastian is different from the other princes she has met—he’s “sweet, [he’s] considerate. [He] listen[s] to people” (82). At the start of novel, Sebastian fears that this difference means he isn’t the type of prince that his family and his kingdom want—concerns that motivate him to keep parts of himself hidden. As Lady Crystallia, the character becomes more assertive and confident. Frances describes watching Crystallia as like seeing Sebastian but “more. Bigger. More amazing” (74). Sebastian reaches for the strength of Lady Crystallia in moments of internal crisis, as when he exclaims he “needs to go out in [Frances’s newest dress] right now” after Juliana shows interest in a betrothal (86).
Wang suggests Sebastian the Crown Prince and Lady Crystallia represent two parts of Sebastian the person. If Prince Sebastian can be too self-effacing, Crystallia can be overly assertive such as when Crystallia “forbid[s] [Frances] to leave” and demands she “return to [her] servant quarters, now!” (173). As much as Sebastian feels being Lady Crystallia is a risk, the Prince becomes miserable when attempting to cut off that facet of himself. All of these qualities make up Sebastian’s character, and his arc finds him embracing and integrating both parts as equally true by the end of the novel. Presenting as Sebastian, he pushes Frances’s to embrace her own true passion in her designs by pointing out her “name is on the dress but none of [her] in it” (246). Presenting as Lady Crystallia, the character engages in the vulnerability of a first kiss with Frances (264-65).
With the introduction of Lady Sophia in the opening scene, Wang establishes the traditional social mores of gender expression in the world of the novel as well as the idea that there are those willing to risk disrupting them. Wang depicts Lady Sophia, who “absolutely ruined her gown last night by going riding in the woods” (5)—a more traditionally masculine activity in the 19th century—as unrepentant over the ruined gown. She doubles down on her rebellion, telling Frances that she “hate[s] this as much as” Frances does and asking for a “ghastly” dress (6). Unlike the gleeful young women with “SQUEEEAAL!!” in large letters above them as they read the invitation to Sebastian’s ball, Lady Sophia rejects the gendered notion that a young woman’s highest prize should be marriage won by conforming to hegemonic strictures on gendered beauty. Instead, she requests a dress that expresses her boldness—her true self.
Wang’s climax underscores this theme by drawing the King and his men in the fashion show as confident and even coquettish in their gowns on the catwalk (257), presenting traditionally masculine characters joyfully embracing traditionally feminine clothing. King Leroy finds a new playful way of expressing his charisma and ability to command attention as he models and poses for the crowd (261), demonstrating his growth as a character and modeling a path toward greater empathy and an expansive, fluid view of gender identity and expression full of vibrancy, personal affirmation, and joy.
Familial expectations that cleave to restrictive social mores provide the greatest obstacle to the characters’ personal growth and relationships. Wang’s whimsical, fairytale setting allows an accessible exploration of a timely theme with contemporary relevance. As the Crown Prince of Belgonia, Sebastian encounters pressure to conform to an ill-fitting mold from all sides—most notably his parents, whose perspective initially represents a general public tendency toward gender essentialism. In Chapter 3, the Queen tells Sebastian that his “most important role in life is preserving [their] family legacy” in the context of a conversation about marriage, implicitly referencing his responsibility to produce an heir. This reductive framework appears once again when Princess Louise describes her “stallion, Sir James [as her] REAL betrothed” (145), unwittingly referencing the concept of breeding, which makes the adults laugh and triggers Sebastian’s fears about his ability to meet his family’s expectations. When Sebastian points out that he “just turned sixteen” and has “a whole life ahead of [him] to find a wife” (70). However, his parents’ lives have been defined by the pressures of the same expectations justification for their insistence is that the familial expectations since they were betrothed at three years old. From their perspective, in giving Sebastian the choice of his bride they’re already making a concession toward more progressive social attitudes regarding love and marriage.
Through the novel, Wang includes glimpses of social mores that privilege reproduction over personal happiness that underscore the King and Queen’s perspective. Though the novel doesn’t depict Sebastian or his parents at the ball that begins the story, it does zoom in on a mother relishing the fact that her daughter “spent four hours with the hairdresser this morning” (11), when only the prior year the girl was disinterested in her appearance. Another mother meditates on her daughter growing up, suggesting that grooming oneself for marriage is necessary to become an adult woman.
Wang also links the adherence to gender essentialist social mores with a capitalist pursuit of profit, pitting the safe against the progressive both artistically and economically. Peter Trippley—one of the trio of men who guffaw that “all those girls who’ve been throwing themselves at [the Prince] must feel like such idiots” (221) after hearing the news that Sebastian wears dresses—is also the product of familial influence, internalizing his father’s pursuit of secure profit over progressive designs and innovation. Though Peter describes himself as “quite a fan of luxury threads” (94), he insists on creating a collection with Frances that will sell to “the sophisticated shopper [Trippley’s is] trying to court” (240). He champions “the classic,” suggesting that he seeks to harness the social capital of traditional appeal for financial gain. As a result, he cannot think as creatively as Frances nor accept Sebastian until Lady Crystallia has won over a money-spending crowd.
In crafting the characters, Wang suggests that narrow and restricted social expectations on gender expression and identity force people to compromise and limit themselves, holding them back from the people they were meant to be. In The Prince and the Dressmaker, Wang positions familial expectations that reflect social mores in opposition to Gender Expansive Self-Expression Through Fashion. Ultimately, the arc of the narrative offers redemption for Sebastian’s relationship with his parents, signifying that family roles can alternatively be built on acceptance and care.
The friendship and love that grows between Frances and Sebastian actively facilitates their personal growth, allowing them to achieve their dreams while maintaining their personal integrity. The love and acceptance they share ultimately saves them from sacrificing parts of themselves in favor of familial expectations or social strictures on who they can be and how they will live. Initially, each one sees the other more clearly than they see themselves, enabling them to encourage and challenge each other to complete their arcs in the novel’s resolution. Sebastian’s growing trust in and affection for Frances makes him feel invested in her journey as a designer. Wang depicts Crystallia falling asleep on the table, keeping Frances company as she designs late into the night (99). Only a few pages later, Sebastian offers Frances glasses to allow her to see more comfortably and aid her work (103). Sebastian’s greatest demonstration of support comes when Crystallia agrees to meet Madame Aurelia, despite anxiety about “going to a SPA and [...] wearing very little clothing” (116). After helping Frances show her work to Aurelia, Sebastian affirms her talent and work ethic by saying “there’s no one else like [Frances]. It’s like nothing can ever stop [her]” (134). Despite the conflict in the relationship over the course of the narrative, Sebastian’s belief in Frances never wavers. When Sebastian sees the conservative Trippley’s collection she designed under Peter’s guidance, he asks: “Is this what YOU want?” (246). This challenge from a trusted and beloved source is what allows Frances to acknowledge what she already knows and act on what she wants: to display work that truly represents her style.
Frances also provides crucial support to Sebastian. Though Sebastian’s masculine presentation and position as the Crown Prince initially startle her, Frances immediately embraces Sebastian as a fellow lover of beautiful and innovative gowns. Rather than being “weirded out” as Sebastian anticipates, Frances declares designing for the Prince her “dream job” (39). She also doesn’t hesitate to praise Lady Crystallia, describing Crystallia as “a goddess” and the Prince’s transformation as “magic” (74). Crystallia serves as a kind of muse for Frances, whose goal becomes designing “something that’s gonna make people want to look just like” Lady Crystallia (99). Witnessing and contributing to Sebastian’s joy as he inhabits Crystallia allows Frances to be clear-sighted when the King misconstrues Sebastian as “confused about himself” (229). She’s able to state the truth plainly: “how afraid [Sebastian] was of what [his parents] would think of him.” She describes the Prince as “perfect” (230), allowing the King to see past and reject his own learned prejudices and accept Sebastian for his whole self.
Through Frances and Sebastian’s relationship arc, Wang pinpoints that often, advocating for a friend proves easier than advocating for oneself. The novel depicts a fully mutual and equitable relationship, modeling positive support structures for its young adult readers.
Plus, gain access to 9,100+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Asian American & Pacific Islander...
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Graphic Novels & Books
View Collection
Juvenile Literature
View Collection
LGBTQ Literature
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection