63 pages 2 hours read

London Labour and the London Poor

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1851

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Volume 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Section 1 Summary: “The Destroyers of Vermin”

The first section of Volume 3 covers the various types of exterminators in London. Mayhew begins by examining rat catchers, discussing their techniques, their interactions with rats, and the complexities of rat populations. The text emphasizes the challenges of rats, their rapid reproduction, and the rat catchers’ role in controlling rat populations and addressing infestations. In addition, Mayhew provides accounts of rat killing matches held in a London public house and describes the professional rat catcher known as Jack Black, who was celebrated for his skills. Mayhew highlights Black’s fearless handling of rats, public demonstrations, and expertise—and touches on Black’s involvement in bird catching and fishing as well.

Mayhew then pivots to discussing other pests, including the behavior, impact on human life, and ecological roles of flies. He describes different types of flies, such as house flies and mosquitoes, emphasizing their annoyance and potential for disease transmission. Mayhew details the young boys who sell “catch-’em-alive” fly papers, the manufacturing process of fly paper, and the trade’s seasonal and uncertain nature. The author also examines other bugs, such as fleas and bed bugs, providing detailed descriptions. Mayhew concludes the section by touching on crickets and the cultural significance of their chirping in literature and daily life.

Sections 2-6 Summary: “Street-Exhibitors,” “Street-Musicians,” “Street Vocalists,” “Street-Artists,” and “Exhibitors of Trained Animals”

These sections cover the various performers who operated on London’s streets. Mayhew begins with puppet performers, such as the Punch showmen. He provides insights into the shows’ technical and creative aspects as well as the challenges that faced the puppeteers, such as declining earnings. He highlights the camaraderie among Punch showpeople and the community interactions. Mayhew then pivots from detailing specific performers to describing the British tradition of Guy Fawkes Day. He discusses its history and the shift in the effigies from depicting historical individuals to depicting those who represented celebrities and political figures.

Mayhew returns to the topic of street performers by discussing their various types, including acrobats, conjurers, fire eaters, snake swallowers, clowns, and other unique entertainers. He shares their personal histories, the techniques they used in their acts, the reactions of their audiences, and the financial aspects of their professions. He also describes the life and practices of strolling actors, known as “mummers,” who had their own slang and often performed in canvas booths during fairs. Mayhew describes different fair pieces that they performed during these events. Private business performances, which took place outside fairs, involved more complete plays with some parts omitted and improvised dialogue. In addition, Mayhew touches on the legal issues that strolling actors faced in certain circumstances, such as performing without a license. Another performance profession that Mayhew discusses is ballet performers, who presented ballets as comic pieces; well-known clowns often performed the comic roles. Exhibitors of curiosities were yet another type of performer; within this category were showpeople who manipulated mechanical figures as well as telescope exhibitors, microscope presenters, and military exercise exhibitors.

Mayhew next describes the exhibitors of trained animals, focusing mostly on the “Happy Family” exhibitions, which showcased a collection of animals coexisting in a single cage. He notes that some animals, such as monkeys, were easier to work with, while others, like hawks and ferrets, were harder. Additionally, he describes exhibitors of trained birds and mice.

Sections 7-13 Summary: “Skilled and Unskilled Labour,” “Garret-Masters,” “The Coal Heavers,” “Ballast-Men,” “Lumpers,” “The Dock-Labourers,” and “Cheap Lodging-Houses”

These sections cover various labor professions, particularly those related to coal handling, cabinetmaking, and producing doll’s eyes. In describing the cabinetmaking trade, Mayhew highlights the divide between men who belonged to trade societies and those who did not: The latter faced the issues of oversupply and exploitation. The author then delves into the manufacturing of doll’s eyes, discussing the distinction between common and natural (lifelike) doll eyes and their uses.

Next, Mayhew discusses the challenges and injustices facing laborers in the coal trade and related industries in 19th-century London. Mayhew describes their struggles with alcohol consumption, exploitation, and poor working conditions. He provides insights into the various classes of laborers in the coal industry. In discussing the ballast heavers, he reveals how publicans and intermediaries exploited these workers’ dependence on alcohol to secure employment. He emphasizes the negative impact of this system on the well-being of the ballast heavers and their families. He continues this reasoning by exploring the detrimental effects of alcohol consumption, particularly among the laboring class. He also presents testimonies from ballast heavers’ wives, offering accounts of the hardships resulting from their husbands’ alcohol-driven behaviors.

Mayhew then describes the casual dock laborers who engaged in physically demanding tasks, such as unloading ships, wheeling goods, and operating winches. He highlights the work’s precarious nature. Casual laborers often waited for jobs, and their wages fluctuated based on the demand for labor. This fluctuation resulted in economic hardship and increased rates of vagrancy or pauperism. In addition, Mayhew draws attention to the living conditions of the laborers, noting the stark contrast between the wealth that the dock operations generated and the poverty that the dock workers and their families experienced. He discusses efforts to change the system, including using a “ticket” system to promote good conduct.

Additionally, Mayhew describes the conditions and inhabitants of cheap lodging houses in London. He focuses on a particular house, giving descriptions of the building and the people who lived there, most of whom were casual laborers, beggars, and pickpockets.

Sections 14-18 Summary: “The Transit of Great Britain and the Metropolis,” “London Watermen, Lightermen, and Steamboat-Men,” “London Omnibus-Drivers and Conductors,” “London Cab-Drivers,” and “London Carmen and Porters”

These sections focus on the various types of transit in London and the workers who operated them. Mayhew highlights the expansion of railway networks, revealing insights into their operational lengths and the role of steam power in their development. He acknowledges the financial intricacies of railway projects and illustrates the diverse workforce required for the operation of these railways. The text underscores the safety record of railways compared to other modes of travel. This data-driven account highlights the increasing popularity of railways and their importance in the transportation landscape.

Mayhew then turns to inland navigation, particularly of canals and rivers. He discusses the role of Thames watermen, who transported goods along the river. Initially engaged in transporting produce, privileged watermen once held special rights associated with nobility and dignitaries. However, the advent of steamers and changes in transportation affected their trade, leading to financial struggles, poverty, and the formation of clubs to protect their interests. In addition, Mayhew discusses the steamboats themselves and talks about their growing popularity and the changes they brought to river transportation, also mentioning the challenges of steam navigation and the efforts to regulate and improve safety.

He then describes the forms of land transportation on the streets of London. The first is the omnibus. Mayhew describes the extensive network of omnibus routes throughout the city, the fare structure, and the role of the omnibuses in connecting the city and its suburbs. Mayhew then covers the regulatory changes, the decline in the comfort of hackney coaches, and the rise of cab transportation. He also delves into the different types of cab drivers and discusses the public and private uses of carriages and horses, providing statistics on their numbers, usage, and revenue generation. Additionally, Mayhew explores the roles and regulations of the porters of goods in London, distinguishing among the different classes of porters, and discusses the concerns about changes in transportation methods affecting their traditional roles.

Sections 19-20 Summary: “London Vagrants” and “Meeting of Ticket-of-Leave Men”

The last sections of Volume 3 cover the issue of vagrancy in London. Mayhew attributes its causes to uncertain employment, economic challenges, and the unintentional consequences of the “casual wards” established to aid unemployed individuals. He differentiates between honest working-class individuals and vagrant beggars, highlighting the virtues of the former, and distinguishes Irish vagrants, driven by poverty, from those seeking temporary work. Disease transmission and associated costs are among the other topics, and Mayhew advocates for better management by police. He emphasizes vagrancy’s connection to crime through reports and testimonies, as well as statistics highlighting vagrancy’s significance. The root causes of vagrancy include temperament, upbringing, and negative influences. Additionally, Mayhew discusses the London Vagrants’ Asylums, which offered seasonal shelter to unhoused individuals during harsh weather conditions. The shelters attracted people from various backgrounds, including laborers seeking work and professional vagrants. Mayhew details the admission process, examinations, and accommodations. These institutions provided temporary refuge for those experiencing exposure and malnutrition. Interviews with the superintendent reveal that those who sought shelter included unemployed laborers, artisans, sailors, and Irish immigrants.

Volume 3 Analysis

Originally, Volume 3 concluded the series; Volume 4 was published a decade later. As such, Volume 3 covers more of a miscellaneous group of subjects than the previous volumes. In addition to examining the professions of street entertainers and performers, Mayhew touches on the various exterminators dealing with London’s pests. One of the best-known individuals that Mayhew interviewed throughout the four volumes of the work, Jack Black, belonged to this profession. However, he presented himself as an entertainer; he had a flamboyant persona and a penchant for doing tricks with the rats. Through their conversation, Mayhew offers a window into the often overlooked, yet undeniably essential, profession of rat catching. However, Mayhew’s inclusion of Jack Black in his work reveals an interesting bias. In setting up the interview’s presentation, he notes, “As I wished to obtain the best information about rat and vermin destroying, I thought I could not do better now than apply to that eminent authority” (Volume 3, 11). Mayhew states outright his purpose for highlighting Jack Black over other rat catchers: He was an authority in the field, the best at what he did, and thus should receive preferential treatment within the text. He is not sought at random but rather because of his importance. However, this idea of Jack Black being the best relies on his showmanship and notoriety. He might or might not have been the best rat catcher but was the most exciting option to show off. This highlights the issue that critics often raised when they accused Mayhew of casting a selective spotlight on specific individuals. This implicit bias implies that some personalities hold more recognition or importance within the societal narrative than others and thereby inadvertently reveals the hierarchical nature of Victorian society, whereby individuals deemed noteworthy enjoyed more visibility, while others remained relegated to the peripheries. This selection bias demonstrates how social prejudices and preconceived notions can subtly seep into well-intentioned works like this one. By anticipating greater interest in Jack Black than a less theatrical rat catcher, Mayhew reinforces that certain figures, possibly those with more sensational or socially recognizable roles, deserve this attention. In contrast, less celebrated individuals remained relatively obscure despite their contributions to the urban landscape. This bias ultimately shapes the narrative’s portrayal of the urban poor in the eyes of critics, emphasizing some stories while inadvertently silencing others.

Another subject of focus in this volume is the living spaces and conditions of people experiencing poverty and the working class. Many of their dwellings are in terrible condition, such as the house of one laborer: “The ceiling was as wet as a newly-washed floor. The grate was fireless, the children barefoot, and the bedstead (for there was a bedstead) was bedless, and all showed cheerless poverty” (Volume 3, 243). Lodging houses feature prominently in Mayhew’s descriptions. These establishments were makeshift shelters for the urban poor, where individuals who couldn’t afford better accommodations sought refuge. Mayhew’s depictions reveal cramped, squalid spaces with a complete lack of privacy. These houses teemed with diverse individuals who shared meager amenities and navigated an environment often rife with disease, vice, and desperation. These harrowing living conditions emphasized the dire circumstances facing those residing there. The casual wards, another focal point, were an institutional response to the plight of the impoverished. Operating as temporary shelters for people experiencing homelessness, casual wards were meant to provide a minimal level of relief. However, Mayhew’s accounts highlight the dehumanizing nature of these places. Conditions in casual wards were often harsh and punitive, and their inhabitants were subject to strict rules and regulations. People in need were stripped of their dignity and treated as little more than cogs in a bureaucratic machine. The lack of basic amenities and the punitive aspects of these shelters depicted a system that often exacerbated the suffering of those it was meant to assist. Mayhew, however, takes an even harsher view. In his discussions of the various causes of vagrancy, he argues that the establishment of casual wards inadvertently led to increased vagrancy. Regarding the hypothetical transition of an unemployed laborer to a vagrant, Mayhew states:

He is no sooner, however, become an inmate of the casual wards, and breakfasts and sups off the bounty of the workhouse, than he learns a most dangerous lesson—he learns how to live by the labour of others (Volume 3, 371).

Mayhew takes issue with the system because he believed that the lack of industrial habits and poor educational systems contributed to developing a vagrant disposition. In addition, he emphasizes the importance of cultivating a habit of industry and purposeful work to combat vagrancy. He praises the virtues of honest working-class individuals while distinguishing them from vagrant beggars and thieves. Mayhew is not alone in this mentality. The fear of the destitute coming to rely too heavily on aid led to tighter restrictions on who could or could not receive said aid. This issue remains a political flashpoint in the modern day.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 9,200+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools