22 pages • 44 minutes read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
John Donne is and is not a Renaissance poet. That historical context is problematic. The Renaissance did not happen over a weekend. What contemporary historians term the Renaissance was in fact an evolutionary transition within European culture from a theocentric civilization to a broad humanitarian civilization, a movement away from the logic and assumptions of a culture that collectively positioned the Christian God at its center and one more intrigued by the complexities of humanity itself, informed but not limited by assumptions about a Creator.
John Donne’s historical context is his position now as one of the foremost poetic voices of the Elizabethan Era, important not so much because of how he embodied that historical era as by how his poetry, particularly his love poetry, anticipated its ultimate collapse. “Break of Day” suggests exactly this historical positioning. The poem both summarizes the love poetry of Donne’s historical era—as part of the sea-change brought about by nearly two centuries of evolutionary thought and radical challenges to more than a millennium of theocentric writing, the poem explores a decidedly secular kind of love; the two lovers here represent something other than sacred love. Rather this love is expressed in the muscle and friction of physical love. In addition, Donne breaks with his historical era with his radical experiment in perspective, endowing the woman with a voice. In this, Donne’s poem anticipates the kind of love poetry that would ultimately define Modernism nearly 500 years after his death.
As a Renaissance poem, then, “Break of Day” edges away from theological discourse about the nature of love within a cosmos defined and sustained by a God and from the assumption that human love is an expression of the soul. Love here is decidedly secular, even profane. In gifting the woman with the right of narrative center, in suggesting a woman can be a complex, sexual being, and in the unflattering light in which the poem gives to a man taking care of business like a man ought to, the poem anticipates cultural assumptions that would not be embraced into popular awareness for centuries. Perhaps this might account for Donne’s reluctance to publish his work.
John Donne’s literary context reflects more what came after his era, long after, than what came before it. It would cause Donne significant confusion, even consternation to find out he was in fact the most prominent of the British Metaphysical poets, primarily because the term itself was not coined until nearly two centuries after his death. When Dr. Samuel Johnson (1709-1784), an essayist and minor poet known to contemporary readers largely for his work producing the first dictionary of the English language, coined the term, not surprising given his penchant (obsession?) for definitions, he was most likely referring to how these Elizabethan poets—among them Donne, George Herbert, Andrew Marvell, Richard Crawshaw—tackled ambitious, grandly metaphysical topics about the nature of love and the concept of death, the place of the soul, the integrity of morality itself, and supremely the role of God (most of the metaphysical poets eventually joined the ministry). These poets were hyper-intellectuals, their poetry often dense and intimidating in their arguments (their most direct descendant in American literature would be the first-generation Puritan poets, most notably the Congregationalist apologist Edward Taylor).
Since Dr. Johnson coined it, the term “metaphysical” has come to suggest the poets’ collective affinity for highly eccentric poetic lines, their willingness to use jarring and often unsettling figures of speech (as for instance here when Donne suggests the dawn has no tongue), their interest in expanding the concept of the speaker of a poem, their deep learning and their allusions to the literatures of Antiquity, their often cutting wit and withering sense of honesty when dealing with humanity’s foibles, and ultimately their fascination with rhythm itself and their experiments with nontraditional beats. Interestingly, Dr. Johnson, a staid and quite conservative literary critic, actually used the term “metaphysical” derisively to suggest the pretentiousness and careless crafting of Donne and his ilk. Only later, more than two more centuries, the self-described Modernists poets, most notably Nobelist T. S. Eliot, used the term “metaphysical” not as a put-down but rather to suggest the ambitious reach of these poets’ intellect and their unapologetically bold experiments in upcycling poetry itself into radical forms that poets would not fully appreciate for nearly 400 years.
Plus, gain access to 9,100+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By John Donne