58 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The text’s events and characters’ relationships problematize the idea that something or someone can be purely heroic or entirely villainous, and it becomes clear that someone’s goodness or evilness is often a matter of context and perspective rather than absolute truth. Nothing or no one is inherently or completely good or evil, and the possession of either quality in one moment is not a guarantee that one will be a hero or villain forever. Instead, morality shifts based on personal motives, external pressures, and emotional conflicts, complicating the simplistic narratives of good versus evil found in traditional fairy tales.
The ambiguous heroism and villainy of certain characters remains in question for most of the narrative, demonstrating the way individuals combine both qualities. Agatha, for example, wants to be good, but she does lie to Sophie when she begins to question Sophie’s loyalty rather than speaking to Sophie directly about her concerns. Lying is one of the most common qualities of a witch, who seeks to disrupt the happily-ever-afters of other characters in her tale, causing Agatha to wonder if Sophie is her story’s villain. Sophie, for her part, also lies, but she tries so hard to be good. Her belief that actions define morality, rather than intentions, leads her to justify her decisions even when they harm others. Though she feels guilty for preventing Agatha’s wish to be with Tedros from coming true, she thinks, “It wasn’t Evil, stopping their kiss […]. No, it was all for Good. Her friend had come back to her” (220). Sophie believes Tedros is the villain of her story, and she is shocked when she realizes that Tedros thinks of himself as a good guy who deserves a happily-ever-after. This disconnect between perspectives highlights how the labels of hero and villain are often imposed rather than innate. Dean Sader is largely villainous, but she did her dastardly work of bringing the School Master back only after she showed him incredible loyalty; she believed herself to be his true love. This loyalty and love are qualities most often associated with goodness, not evil. Thus, almost every character possesses attributes that align with both heroism and villainy, demonstrating how these can overlap and converge.
Further, Agatha is the only character who seems to consciously realize that this relationship exists, that the qualities of goodness and evilness intersect and overlap. When she reflects on the contradiction between Sophie’s vows to be Good and her somewhat Evil choices, she thinks, “Every fairy tale could be twisted to serve a purpose. Good could turn into Evil, Evil into Good, back and forth, back and forth, just like it had in the war between the schools a year ago” (163). This realization challenges the notion of a fixed destiny, emphasizing that moral alignment is not a rigid construct but a fluid and evolving state. This is true of characters’ choices and personalities as well as the fairy tales themselves. On one hand, Sophie and Agatha’s story upsets the balance between males and females in their society, something that benefits girls while boys suffer. To girls, the changes appear to be Good because it empowers them and confers greater power on them rather than their princes; to boys, the girls’ tale seems Evil because it results in a loss of their power and social standing. This shifting power dynamic underscores how morality is often dictated by those who hold authority, rather than by any inherent truth. These circumstances, relationships, and realizations highlight the relative nature of heroism and villainy and the way they can overlap and change based on who assesses them.
The nature of the concept of “gender”—that there are no qualities or attributes fundamental to the sensibilities or behaviors of each sex—is revealed by the characters, the success of Merlin’s lost spell, and the gnomes’ ability to change sex until they come of age. Rather than presenting masculinity and femininity as opposing forces, the novel frames them as intertwined, socially constructed categories that are often used to impose control over individuals rather than reflect any inherent truth.
The school’s focus on empowering females and society’s shift away from its traditional patriarchal power dynamics reveal the strength, authority, and independence of women. In fact, Sophie and Agatha first realize that something strange is happening in their world when they witness diverse groups of women traveling together on the Flowerground. Princesses and witches are no longer divided by who gets a prince and who doesn’t, who is thought to be intrinsically Good or Evil. Further, females are no longer required to meet ridiculous beauty standards or the expectation that they be ugly; women have more opportunity to choose who they want to be, and their choices vary widely. Dot, a witch, prefers to be svelte and attractive, even making choices that used to be typical of the Good and heroic, while Anadil and Hester would rather have things go back to the way they were before Agatha chose Sophie. Even the differences between Professor Dovey and Lady Lesso, former Ever and Never teachers, show that women can be gentle and nurturing or exacting and tough, or a combination of these qualities at various times. Neither is more “right,” natural, or good than the other. These contrasts reinforce that identity is not predetermined by gender but shaped by individual choices and societal expectations.
Further, the success of characters who employ Merlin’s lost spell shows that the perceived differences between genders are socially constructed rather than inherent. Tristan successfully masquerades as Yara in the School for Girls’ simply by avoiding speaking, so as not to reveal his deeper voice. Yara is attractive, so attractive that Sophie says, “One look at her, and Tedros will forget all about his wish maker” (89). Moreover, when Sophie masquerades as Filip in the School for Boys, Tedros tells others that “[Filip] backs [him] up and fights for [him] in a way no girl ever could” (414). Tedros’s praise of Filip highlights his internalized biases, revealing how he has been conditioned to see certain traits as “masculine” even when they are embodied by a disguised woman. Tristan’s and Sophie’s ability to pass themselves off as the opposite sex with little preparation or deviation from their natural personalities shows that qualities like grace or loyalty aren’t the sole domain of women while characteristics like strength and bravery aren’t unique to men.
Finally, the gnomes’ ability to change sex, as well as the Five Rules Yuba teaches his female students, demonstrates how society dictates which qualities are to be associated with masculinity and femininity. Yuba and Helga are the same person, yet the only differences between the two seem to be their sex and clothing. This suggests that gender itself is primarily a performance, one defined by external expectations rather than innate traits. They are otherwise the same, though Yuba dons stereotypically female clothes when he transforms into Helga. Otherwise, Yuba and Helga have the same abilities and temperaments. Agatha quickly identifies the Five Rules as “sexist and reductive” because they include statements such as, “Girls soften. Boys harden” and “Girls caution. Boys ignore” (262). Anadil’s personality, however, shows that girls can be hard, while Tedros shows that boys can be gentle and emotional. Girls, however, are instructed to be soft while boys are hard, that girls should be cautious while boys should throw caution to the wind.
Merlin’s belief that a more peaceful society could result from a human ability to change sexes suggests that empathy is the key to dismantling gendered power structures. Just as gnomes remain neutral in times of war, unwilling to injure others over their perceived differences, perhaps greater understanding between boys and girls would reduce their animosity and bitterness.
The characters and events in the novel demonstrate that the traditional happily-ever-after, which seems to be a guarantee of eternal happiness that follows one’s youthful choices, is not a reality. Instead, the novel suggests that happiness is fluid, contingent on personal growth, shifting relationships, and the inevitability of change.
Early on, Agatha asks her mother how two people can “know if they’re happy” if they cannot see their storybook, highlighting the way characters have been taught to expect a happily-ever-after, though not to recognize if they’re truly happy (13). This moment underscores how fairy tales condition people to believe that happiness is something external, predetermined, and permanent, rather than a state of being that must be actively cultivated. Callis tells Agatha that, “If they have to ask if they’re happy, they probably aren’t” (13). Agatha and Sophie’s kiss was supposed to end their story and result in their happily-ever-after, but Agatha realizes that she feels an intense desire for a different ending to their story, an ending that includes Tedros, the prince she rejected in favor of the friend she loves. Once she’s back at school, Agatha tells Hester, “Once upon a time, all I needed was a friend to be happy […]. Then I thought I needed more. It’s the problem with fairy tales. From far away, they seem so perfect. But up close, they’re just as complicated as real life” (264). Her realization reflects a key critique of the fairy-tale structure—the assumption that once a character finds love, whether platonic or romantic, they will be eternally fulfilled. In contrast, Agatha’s experience suggests that fulfillment is an ongoing process, not a fixed destination. In reality, feelings are messy, people’s loyalties can be divided, and the prospect of feeling happy and blissful forever is just a fantasy rather than an actual possibility.
By the end of the book, each girl has made a wish and a choice that she believes will lead to her happiness, but neither seems to be guaranteed a future unblemished by regret, anger, and loss. Sophie wished for her mother, and her mother’s ghost appeared to usher the School Master back to life. Thus, Sophie is with a man who chooses her as she has longed to be chosen, but she doesn’t get more time with her mother, as Vanessa’s ghost disintegrates before her eyes. The narrator says the girls were “Once true loves, [but are] now pulled apart like strangers, each in the arms of a boy, Good with Good, Evil with Evil … Both of their wishes granted” (433). This moment drives home the idea that getting what one wishes for does not necessarily lead to happiness. Instead, the story suggests that longing, change, and loss are inevitable parts of life that do not simply resolve into perfect endings. Sophie never wished for Evil, however, and has spent most of the text trying to prove her Goodness. When she reflects on her and Agatha’s circumstances, “there [is] no forgiveness [in Sophie’s eyes]. Just a blank distance, as if she no longer knew the dark-haired princess in front of her” (424). Her reaction highlights how the pursuit of happiness—especially when dictated by external expectations—can lead to disappointment, as the reality of one’s choices rarely matches the fantasy of them.
Sophie once asked Tedros why a girl can’t have both her best friend and her prince, and he had no compelling response. However, it seems that this is what both girls want: to have the freedom to prioritize each other, to be true to themselves, and to develop romantic love too. The idea that a single relationship, whether romantic or platonic, must define one’s happily ending is inherently limiting, and the novel challenges this by demonstrating how love exists in multiple, often conflicting forms.
Without the ability to achieve these conditions, and because life can be so unpredictable and varied, the idea of a happily-ever-after just doesn’t seem realistic. Instead, the novel argues that happiness is complex, ever-changing, and shaped by the choices people make—not a final reward granted at the end of a story.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Action & Adventure
View Collection
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Fate
View Collection
Forgiveness
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection